That ain’t right
In our house, recently, we’ve been discussing the injustices of life, like, why real estate is so crazy inflated in Philadelphia, and why Alex can’t get a little chihuahua right now. Of all of these, however, the most unfair and cruel realities of them all is the tremendous discrepancy in underwear pricing for men and women.
OBSERVE, NON BELIEVERS:
There are several problems with this. Allow me to list.
- ONE PAIR OF UNDERWEAR IS $12.00
- You can get FOUR WHOLE PAIRS of men’s underwear for the same price.
- “A flattering fit, a comfortable fabrication, and cute detail, make for a perfect everyday pair.” The implications are obvious – you can’t afford seven of these fuckers, unless you want to drop almost $100 on a week’s worth of underpants. SO THIS IS GOING TO BE THE PAIR YOU WEAR EVERYDAY, you dirty, dirty lady.
- Not pictured, a review from a customer (she gave this underwear five stars): “…they are affordable which is great cuz my basset hound likes to eat them. Haha.” HAHA. HA. HA. They taste like expensive.
- What makes the above comment terrifying is that these are affordable. AS OPPOSED TO WHAT? Oh.
What’s all the more horrible about all of this is that there’s no logic involved. The less fabric, and subsequently, the more comfortable the underwear is for people who’s asses are not prone to falling off (and therefore need some sort of parachute apparatus to save it in the event that it does), have to pay MUCH MORE for their underwear. You would think that ass-saving technology would cost more, and that less fabric would cost, you know, less. But the opposite is true. That ain’t right!
2 Comments »
She doesn’t have one, that’s why the underwear is so expensive.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Could… could you post a pic of her backside? That would really help me… sympathize(?)with your plight.
Or instead of buying underwear you could just go commando.